Parents in England face higher fines than ever before if they take their children out of class without permission.

If a child misses five days of school for unauthorised absence, the Department for Education (DfE) has said a fine must be considered.

For the past several years school absence fines have started at £60, rising to £120 if they are not paid within 21 days. However, the DfE has said fines will now increase to a base of £80, rising to £160.

Almost 400,000 penalty notices were issued to parents in England in 2022-23 for unauthorised school absences – considerably higher than pre-pandemic levels.

Critics have slammed this for "addressing the symptoms of absence, not the causes."

Nearly nine in ten (89.3%) of the fines were for unauthorised holidays as families looked to book cheaper vacations outside school term times, according to DfE figures released in December.

Government guidance is expected to clarify when financial penalties for school absences should be used to ensure councils issue fines appropriately.

The DfE has said school absence fines will be brought under a national framework to help tackle inconsistencies in their use across England.

Under the new measures – which have been announced as part of the Government’s efforts to try to cut down on the number of children who are regularly missing school – every state school in England will share their daily attendance registers with the DfE, councils and academy trusts.

When will this come into effect?

According to PA, the higher fines for absences will come into effect from September.

The DfE hopes the data set will help schools spot and support children at risk of persistent absence or in danger of becoming missing from education.

Rob Tarn, chief executive of Northern Education Trust and founder of England’s first attendance hub, has also been appointed by the DfE as the new national attendance ambassador.

Guidance – setting out how schools and local authorities must take a “support-first” approach to help pupils and their families to tackle barriers to attendance – will be made statutory from August, the DfE has said.

Education Secretary Gillian Keegan said: “Our fantastic schools and teachers unlock children’s imagination, potential and social skills which is why improving attendance is my number one priority.

“Today we are taking that next step to further boost attendance and I want to thank those who are working with us including teachers and heads.

“Education standards have risen sharply across the country, with Ofsted ratings up from 68% to nearly 90% since 2010 – and pupils’ performance is ranked as some of the best globally – so it has never been more valuable to be in school.”

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT, said: “A consistent national framework for fines makes sense. Currently, there is significant variation between how and when local authorities issue fines to parents.

“However, parents will likely be surprised that at a time when schools are struggling to find enough teachers to teach classes, when buildings are crumbling, and when we are in the middle of a crisis in special needs provision, that the Government is choosing to focus on increasing fines for parents.

“Good attendance is obviously critically important, but fines have long proven to be too blunt a tool and largely ineffective at improving persistent absence.”

He added: “What is really needed to tackle poor attendance is more targeted resources to find out the reasons behind absence, including support for vulnerable families and for children and young people’s mental health.

Recommended reading:

“Without that work, higher fines could just be further punishing already struggling families and children.”

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: “It is not unreasonable to increase the level of fines for unauthorised absence given that they have been fixed at £60 for several years.

“However, it is important to understand that these fines predominately relate to pupils who are taken out of school for term-time holidays. While nobody wants to be in a position of fining parents there simply has to be a marker that this is not acceptable.

“Not only does it affect the child’s education but it means teachers then have to spend time helping children to catch up with lost learning. If everybody did this it would be chaos.”

Labour’s shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson said: “The Conservatives are only just waking up to the damage of persistent absence that has reached historic levels on their watch, but their answer addresses the symptoms of absence, not the causes.

“Persistent absence was rising long before the pandemic – the result of growing unaddressed mental ill health and the impact of years of economic decline hitting family finances and a breakdown of trust between schools and families.

“The Tories should follow Labour’s plan to tackle absence, introduce a register of children not in school, bringing together children’s existing records and investing in access to mental health counselling support in every school to deal with persistent absence once and for all.”