Plans to demolish a bungalow and build new homes in the city outskirts have been blocked after concerns were raised over the number of cars using an "unsuitable" driveway.

Under the proposals, Garfield Bungalow in Fakenham Road in Taverham, which has been described as "in a state of disrepair" by the applicant, was set to be knocked down and replaced by two five-bed homes.

The designs showed that the properties would be similar in style to those nearby and both homes would have an internal floor area of 230sqm.

The plans first emerged in JuneThe plans first emerged in June (Image: Norwich Architects) Each home would have a large kitchen/diner, living room, office and utility, with five bedrooms - three of which have their own bathrooms. 

However, the plans were met with "strong concerns" by a neighbour to Garfield Bungalow.

Concerns were raised about the use of the unsuitable drivewayConcerns were raised about the use of the unsuitable driveway (Image: Google) They wrote to Broadland District Council: "I’m concerned that adding another five-bedroom dwelling to the plot will create a dangerous traffic situation.

"We currently are a five-car family, so adding two five-bedroom dwellings could possibly increase this number to 15 vehicles using a totally unsuitable driveway entrance.

"Garfield bungalow is in a poor state of repair and does require development but even sharing the current driveway with a proposed five-bedroom development gives me concerns regarding access onto Fakenham Road.

As part of the plans, the bungalow would be demolished and replaced with two housesAs part of the plans, the bungalow would be demolished and replaced with two houses (Image: Norwich Architects) "The entrance is also at the very start of the 50mph limit, so most vehicles pass the driveway at speeds greater than 50mph."

READ MORE: Eco-home with more than 30 planning objections can go ahead

Broadland District Council also took issue with the plans, deciding to block the application at the end of September. 

From concerns about nutrient neutrality to the lack of other necessary information, the planning committee outlined five areas for which the plans were refused. 

The applicant can now resubmit plans in accordance with the guidance outlined in the decision notice.