Highways chiefs say work to dual two sections of the A47 in Norfolk is going well - but a dry winter will be crucial to maintain the good progress.
Long-awaited work to dual the road between Blofield and North Burlingham and from Easton to North Tuddenham finally got under way this summer.
And bosses from National Highways - the government company responsible for the work - said they are making "really good progress" on the work.
Chris Griffin, A47 programme leader for National Highways, said work to re-route utilities pipes on the Blofield to North Burlingham section was drawing to a close.
He said work would begin in the autumn to put in the piling necessary for new structures along the route, such as a new bridge over the A47 to connect the villages of Blofield and North Burlingham.
The work will see 1.5 miles of the road dualled and will cost about £100m.
Mr Griffin said piling work is also ongoing on the section between Easton and North Tuddenham, where five-and-a-half miles is being dualled at a cost of up to £250m.
He said vegetation on that section had been cleared and new tanks installed near Honingham to prevent flooding - an issue which closed the road a number of times last winter.
Mr Griffin said: "We are making really good progress. All is looking very good. We just need a nice, dry winter and we will see the scheme progressing very well."
READ MORE: The A47/A11 Thickthorn roundabout revamp is under threat
National Highways started the main dualling work, due to continue until 2026/2027, on both sections of the A47 in August.
Before that, the organisation was limited to preparatory work, because of a legal challenge against the government's decision to grant permission for the work.
Eco-campaigner Dr Andrew Boswell, a former city and county councillor, had taken the matter to the High Court and Court of Appeal.
But his argument - that the government had acted unlawfully in granting permission for A47 schemes because the cumulative environmental impact had not been properly considered - was dismissed.
He asked for the case to be considered at the Supreme Court, but that was rejected, allowing the main construction work to begin.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel