The possible journey a suspect took to and from the scene where a Norfolk teenager was stabbed to death in broad daylight has been scrutinized in court.
Alfie Hammett, 19, and Joshua Howell, 18, have both been charged with the murder of Raymond James Quigley on January 17 last year in the centre of Ipswich, as well as possession of an offensive weapon in a public place.
Hammett, of Rushmere St Andrew, in Suffolk, and Howell, from Ipswich, both deny the charges and are on trial.
Police Constable Chittock gave an account to Ipswich Crown Court of the path the police expect the suspect they have called ‘Male 1’ to have taken.
This was done using footage from CCTV and doorbell cameras along with tracking data from a moped linked to Hammett, who the prosecution say is Male 1.
PC Chittock told the court he has personally retraced the route and the jury was shown body camera footage of his route around Ipswich.
Specifically, the prosecution has said at 2.14pm Alfie Hammett left his house. He drove to the Nacton area of Ipswich and stopped there. It is alleged at 2:24pm Alfie Hammett got back on the moped travelling towards Felixstowe Road. Then the moped arrived at Bishops Hill.
The prosecution then claim Hammett and Howell then met in the grounds of Suffolk New College at 3.12pm.
Then together the court heard they went to the Buttermarket then towards the Cornhill and Westgate Street where they encountered Mr Quigley and his two friends at 3.35pm.
Prosecutor Andrew Jackson said Hammett stabbed Mr Quigley then made his way back to the college and went towards Alexandra Park.
However defence barrister for Alfie Hammett, Stephen Rose KC cross examined PC Chittock and highlighted to the court that the recreation of the route was based on the assumption that Male 1 was the same person throughout all the footage.
The expected journey is not completely filled in with CCTV so some parts have been based on what police say is the most likely path Male 1 would have taken, the court heard.
The trial continues.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article