A former railway worker has won a claim that he was wrongly sacked for gross negligence over a crash involving a train at the Norwich depot.
Nick Smith was dismissed after the shunting of an out of service Greater Anglia train went wrong resulting in it crashing into buffers causing £25,000 damage.
But an employment tribunal heard radios used to communicate between workers had been faulty at the time.
Static interference meant Mr Smith did not receive a warning of how close the train was to hitting the buffers.
A second worker tasked with communicating the distance was also sacked for failing to implement an emergency stop procedure.
At the time of his dismissal in August 2022 Mr Smith had been employed for 30 years, the last 21 years as yard controller at the Norwich Crown Point Depot servicing trains.
Abellio East Anglia Ltd sacked him after concluding that he was not fully concentrating and that, knowing of the radio problems, he should have been on higher alert.
READ MORE: Banham Poultry worker loses chemical spill disability claim
Mr Smith told the tribunal he’d only had 19 seconds to react to the situation, but during its evidence the company said it had been 30-35 seconds.
As the train was travelling at under 5mph, this was enough time to realise radio transmissions had failed and to stop the train, they added.
However, upholding his claims of unfair and wrongful dismissal, employment judge Louise Brown ruled he had not been grossly negligent.
She said: “I did not find that the claimant's actions were anywhere near the ‘grave and weighty’ threshold or that he intentionally acted in a way to breach the respondents' safety policies, and it would be startling if he had chosen to do so especially given the risk to his own safety and that of others on the train.”
READ MORE: Sacked James Paget worker awarded £22k payout at tribunal
She also ruled that him being banned from Greater Anglia premises, not given important documents and not told he could call witnesses to a disciplinary hearing had “created a highly unfair situation”.
A remedy hearing to determine compensation will be held at a later date.
A Greater Anglia spokesperson said: “We do not comment on matters that are the subject of ongoing legal proceedings.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here