One of the biggest new housing developments in Norfolk has seen its projected cost soar by more than 12pc, amid mounting fears for the project.
The scheme, in the Gaywood area of King's Lynn, will see 226 homes built by the summer of 2026.
It is being funded by Conservative-run West Norfolk Council (WNC), with some money contributed by central government.
At a recent meeting, the council agreed to increase the estimated budget for the Parkway scheme from £48.367m to £54.462m - amid rising costs linked to inflation - and to proceed with the work.
But opposition councillors raised a series of concerns about the project, with some saying it should be stopped altogether.
Labour's Alexandra Ware told the meeting that the development could become unaffordable.
She pointed out WNC had been forced to abandon plans to build housing on the site of a library and bus station in Hunstanton last month, because of rising costs.
“There will be concerning financial consequences for the borough council whether this [Parkway] scheme is cancelled, stalled or indeed proceeds," Ms Ware said.
“Is the Parkway project really for the benefit of the local community and the people who are in desperate need of decent quality, affordable homes?
"Who will buy the homes for sale on the open market? People who live in the borough or newcomers?”
Councillors also raised concerns about the lack of access roads into the site, with only one entrance planned, and what that could mean for emergency services.
Jo Rust, an independent councillor, objected to the suggestion from Conservatives that the opposition parties did not want homes being built, arguing said that they were simply concerned that they “have to be properly thought out”.
Samantha Sandell, a Conservative cabinet member, said there were a high number of people on the council’s housing list waiting “month in month out” for a home and that the scheme would help address that.
“What we are delivering is affordable social housing, housing that will benefit many residents in this borough.
"What you would be doing by ripping up this plan is depriving people of somewhere to live and call home.”
The funding increase was approved by 27 votes in favour, 15 against and four abstentions.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here